“Shadows Of The Mind” — A Pale Shadow Of Roger Watkins At His Best

Posted: January 14, 2014 in movies
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

shadows of the mind vhs front & back

So here it is — the “lost” and “forgotten” second feature film (not counting numerous hard-core porn flicks he made under various pseudonyms) from legendary (a term I don’t use lightly) cult auteur Roger Watkins, the brains (and heart) behind one of my personal favorite movies of all time, Last House On Dead End Street (the very first film I reviewed on this site lo, those many years ago — okay, enough parentheses for a little while here).

Needless to say, die-hard Watkins worshiper that I am, this is a flick I’ve always wanted to see even though a)Watkins himself disowned it completely and slapped — or, more likely, had slapped , but we’ll get to all that in a minute— the pseudonym of “Bernard Travis” in place of his name for his director’s credit; and b)pretty much everyone else who’s ever seen it has said that it completely sucks, as well.

Still — this is the guy who gave us the most gutter-level, unflinching, uncompromising, and downright nihilisitc piece of no-budget (literally — not a single dollar was spent on the production of LHODES) exploitation cinema ever produced — how bad could it be?

The answer, as it turns out, is pretty fucking bad.

shadows of the mind dutch vhs front & back2

A brief understanding of the behind-the-scenes dictates placed on Watkins is probably in order if we’re to fully comprehend what a celluloid abortion this thing is, and while exact details are sketchy at best, according to the late, great Mr. Watkins’ own recollections, his leading lady in this film, one Marion Joyce, was actually married to the guy who financed this effort, and while she quite obviously couldn’t act, her old man was convinced otherwise and hired Watkins to film what essentially amounted to a feature-length demo reel, complete with script (written by Watkins in collaboration with his friend and former film professor Paul Jensen and Joyce herself) in order to display her dubious “talents” for various potentially interested parties (assuming there were any).

So, yeah — this thing probably shouldn’t have gone any further than a storage box in the loving (but apparently quite annoying) couple’s basement. But then nobody would see it. And nobody would ever know of Ms. Joyce’s abilities (or lack thereof).

And so — well, shit, here’s where things get a bit confusing. Bernard Travis was more than just a pseudonym, it turns out —  or, ore accurately, it wasn’t a pseudonym at all, it was the name of this film’s financier/producer, a guy who apparently owned a chain of movie theaters in New York state. And he also, somehow, got his hands on the rights to LHODES — as a matter of fact, he’s the guy who’s responsible for cutting that film down from its original three-plus-hour length to the 77-minute version that’s been released on VHS and DVD. How legal all this was is anybody’s guess, but I’m thinking the answer is “not very” given that Watkins was able to establish and assert copyright ownership over the film for which he’s best known prior to its seminal DVD  release from Barrel Entertainment (and watch out, by the way, apparently Vinegar Syndrome will be re-issuing it later this year in a more complete cut under its alternate title of The Funhouse, along with tons of new extras — how good life can be sometimes, my friends, how good life can be!).

Of course, by 2005 when Watkins emerged from the shadows of history (rather than the mind) to claim directorship of both these films,  Mr. Travis had committed suicide, so there probably wasn’t much chance of a protracted court fight over who actually “owned” what here.

Watkins, of course, is gone himself now, and so we’ll never know why he didn’t try to claim any sort of legal ownership over Shadows Of The Mind, as well — unless the answer is a very simple, and understandable, he just didn’t want the damn thing.

Anyway, back to the late Mr. Travis. With both this flick and LHODES in his possession, he was able to cut numerous cheap deals with numerous even cheaper fly-by-night VHS distribution outfits both here and abroad (as you can see from the images included with this review) for the two films, and while neither enjoyed any sort of widespread release, both were put out, in small numbers at any rate, here, there, and everywhere. I couldn’t tell you exactly when this movie was shot, but most VHS releases are dated 1980, so we’ll just go with that as the closest thing to an official “street date” we’re ever likely to have here.

shadows in the mind spanish poster

So that’s our history lesson out of the way. On to the plot particulars of Shadows Of The Mind itself : Poor Elise (Joyce) was an eyewitness to the drowning deaths of her father and stepmother as a child, and has been a thoroughly traumatized — and institutionalized — basket case ever since. You can’t stay in the loony bin forever, though (funny, they told me the same thing), and so the day comes when her therapist, Dr. Land (Erik Rolfe) decides she’s perfectly fit and ready to go home — to the cold, empty, abandoned, desolate estate that where she lost her marbles in the first place. Sound psychology at work, I guess,

And so we’re treated to a good 30 minutes or so of Elise not doing much but listlessly and aimlessly wandering the grounds of her old (and now, I guess, new) homestead until her creepy, estranged step-brother , Leland (played with a certain degree of relish by G.E. Barrymore — no relation, I’m assuming, to any or all members  of the celebrated cinematic Barrymore dynasty — in the closest thing this snoozer has to a competent performance) shows up and weird things start happening — like, ya know, people dying.

At this point Shadows Of The Mind at least begins to approximate something interesting, but trust me when I say that you’ve seen this same story done before and seen it done much better. I desperately wanted to like the proceedings just out of sheer loyalty to Watkins and his small but undeniably powerful legacy, but try as I might, anything resembling actual interest in what was happening on-screen just never materialized, despite some moody and evocative location work (like LHODES this was shot in Watkins’ home environs of upstate New York, and has a bleak, early-November vibe to it) and some reasonably well-executed (sorry for the shit pun) kill scenes.

For his part, Watkins at least eschews the kind of point-and-shoot dullness that you or I might resort to with a script this garbled and lame, but he’s certainly not giving things anywhere near his all. The cast go through their motions with, apart from Barrymore, apparently little to no actual idea of what they’re doing, and when the truncated (and probably largely falsified) end credits roll, it feels more like a relief than anything else.

Still, as with all things, don’t take my word for it — a generous cult film aficionado has gone to the trouble of posting this movie in its roughly-80-minute entirety on You Tube(apologies for the German — I think — subtitles, but beggars can’t be choosers), and I offer a link to it here to sate the ravenous appetites of  the curious, masochistic, or both :

So yeah. This is Roger Watkins’ “lost” and “forgotten” second feature film. And it’s fair to say that it was both lost and forgotten for very good reason.

  1. Fringe Void says:

    A thorough and well-written review. I’ve been curious about this flick for a while. Now I know.

  2. stevenmillan says:

    Just finished watching the film,though it’s far from a classic but it does showcase what an effective and skillful filmmaker Roger Watkins was(as he proved with LAST HOUSE ON DEAD END STREET and his “Richard Mahler” porn films[which were some of the darker and bleakest entries in the hardcore erotica genre]),and whatever negatives this film has can easily be fallen upon both producer Bernard Travis and his wife/actress/co-scriptwriter Marion Joyce(who gives it her best in her on-screen performance),for the history behind SHADOWS OF THE MIND is indeed a very fascinating one.

    • trashfilmguru (Ryan C.) says:

      Glad you saw it, I tried to get into the history a bit without bogging the casual reader down with too many details, I think there were some legitimately effective scenes in the film — the murders in particular showed some of that LHODES grittiness — and it’s worth a look for hard-core Watkins fans such as yourself or I. He probably did his best with what he could given the heavy leaning/interference from Travis and his Joyce. All in all, an intriguing curiosity, but far from a great, or even good, movie.

  3. delicreep says:

    For the record, Vinegar Syndrome is releasing the same cut as Barrel did. The only difference is that the gut-ripping scene is from a film source, as opposed to tape. The Vinegar Syndrome release will look amazing (just check out the 2k-scanned easter egg of LHoDES on their Corruption blu-ray and realize that they are creating a new scan form even better elements) but will not be longer than what Barrel put out.

    • Ryan C. (trashfilmguru) says:

      Cool, I’m really looking forward to this finally happening — it’s been in the works for a couple of years now, and should prove to be worth the wait!

  4. zmbdog says:

    Even though I’ve been uploading this for several years now I have yet to actually see it! For the record, it was filmed in 1976 as “Heritage of Blood”. Watkins was so displeased with the final outcome that in 1980 he made a film called “Spitoon” which was a somewhat fictionalized account of ‘Shadows’ troubled production. Unfortunately, he was even more frustrated how “Spitoon” turned out, so much so that he destroyed the negative!

    • Ryan C. (trashfilmguru) says:

      I’ve heard a bit about that here and there over the years! I’d be curious to see it, of course — but none of us ever will!

      • WillM says:

        I wonder why Travis never booked this film in his theaters? AFAIK it never saw any kind of release in the states. But if Travis is the one who cut LHODES down does that mean he is the last one to have the ‘Cuckoo Clocks of Hell’ print?

      • Ryan C. (fourcolorapocalypse) says:

        Great questions all around, I wish I knew the answers!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s